You want to buy three books that are on sale at 20% off. The original prices of the books are 2.50,4.95 and 6.00 how much will you save? Write it in distributions property and without distribution property


Answer 1
Answer: You will save $2.69 from that 3 books

Related Questions


The sum of the page numbers on the facing pages of a book is 761. What are the page​ numbers?



761 *2+1 is the formula


PLEASE HELP!!! 20 POINTS!!! Which of the following is equivalent to the statement below?

If 3x + 1 = 10, then x ≠ 2.
Select the best answer from the choices provided.

A. If x ≠ 2, then 3x + 1 = 10.
B. If 3x + 1 = 10, then x = 2.
C. If x = 2, then 3x + 1 = 10.
D. If x = 2, then 3x + 1 ≠ 10.


Answer: Choice DIf x = 2, then 3x+1 does not equal 10.


Arguments in the form "if this, then that" are known as conditionals. The original conditional can be written in the form "If P, then Q". The P and Q are placeholders for statements. In this case, replace P with "3x+1 = 10" and replace Q with "x does not equal 2"

It turns out that the contrapositive is entirely identical to the original conditional. The contrapositive is in the form "If not Q, then not P". You swap P and Q, also you add "not"s to each to negate them both.

"P" means "3x+1 = 10", so "not P" means "3x+1 does not equal 10"

"Q" means "x does not equal 2", so "not Q" means "x = 2"

"If P, then Q" ----> "if 3x+1 = 10, then x does not equal 2"

"If not Q, then not P" ----> "if x = 2, then 3x+1 does not equal 10" is the proper contrapositive we want.



Step-by-step explanation:

because im albert einstein


Bob gets paid more in tips when he works more hours at the restaurant. Which is the dependent variable? A. hours worked B. tips paid


A. hour worked. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..                                                 

Obviously it's A. hour worked i hope this help:) have a nice day 

What is the value of 3 in 136,422


Ten thousandths place value (30,000)

Hey, can someone please teach me this? I haven't been at school to learn it and I have a quiz later. Example:
The scores on the SAT form a normal distribution with a mean of 500 and a standard deviation of 100.

What is the minimum score necessary to be in the top 15% of the SAT scores?

Find the range of values that define the middle 80% of the distribution of SAT scores.




Step-by-step explanation:

"Top 15%" corresponds to the rightmost area under the standard normal curve to the right of the mean.  That means 85% of the area under this curve will be to the left.  Which z-score corresponds to the area 0.85 to the left?

Using a calculator (invNorm), find this z-score:  invNorm(0.85) = 1.0346.

Which raw score corresponds to this z-score?

Recall the formula for the z-score:

       x - mean

z = ------------------

         std. dev.

Here we have:

       x - 500

z = ------------------ - 1.0364, or x - 500 = 103.64.  Then the minimum score

          100                necessary to be in the top 15% of the scores is

                                  found by adding 500 to both sides:

                                   x = 603.64


WHich is shorter 3/4 of a minute or 2/4 of an hour


3/4 of a minute is 45 seconds,

whereas 2/4 or 1/2 of an hour

would equal 30 minutes

3/4  of a minute I shorter by far


68 goes into 481 how many. times in rounding


The best thing to do is to use a calculator and divided 481 by 68.
481/68= 7.0375
Therefore, rounded, it is 7, with 5 remaining
Hope this helps :) 
68 goes into 481 7 times in rounding because the 0 makes the seven stay the same

81x^4 - ya^4​


Let's simplify step-by-step.





You can’t factorize that...?

Find the following product ^5 square root 4x^2* ^5 square root 4x^2?


Given expression: .

We need to find the product of above given expression.

We can see that both radical expressions being multiplied are of 5th root.

So, we could multiply inside expressions of the 5th root in both radicals.




We can't simplify 5th root of 16 and 5th root of x^4.

Therefore, final answer is



Step-by-step explanation:

I just took the test on edg 2020

Random Questions
And thus for a time I was occupied by exploded systems, mingling, like an unadept, a thousand contradictory theories and floundering desperately in a very slough of multifarious knowledge, guided by an ardent imagination and childish reasoning, till an accident again changed the current of my ideas. When I was about fifteen years old we had retired to our house near Belrive, when we witnessed a most violent and terrible thunderstorm. It advanced from behind the mountains of Jura, and the thunder burst at once with frightful loudness from various quarters of the heavens. I remained, while the storm lasted, watching its progress with curiosity and delight. As I stood at the door, on a sudden I beheld a stream of fire issue from an old and beautiful oak which stood about twenty yards from our house; and so soon as the dazzling light vanished, the oak had disappeared, and nothing remained but a blasted stump. When we visited it the next morning, we found the tree shattered in a singular manner. It was not splintered by the shock, but entirely reduced to thin ribbons of wood. I never beheld anything so utterly destroyed. Before this I was not unacquainted with the more obvious laws of electricity. On this occasion a man of great research in natural philosophy was with us, and excited by this catastrophe, he entered on the explanation of a theory which he had formed on the subject of electricity and galvanism, which was at once new and astonishing to me. All that he said threw greatly into the shade Cornelius Agrippa, Albertus Magnus, and Paracelsus, the lords of my imagination; but by some fatality the overthrow of these men disinclined me to pursue my accustomed studies. It seemed to me as if nothing would or could ever be known. All that had so long engaged my attention suddenly grew despicable. By one of those caprices of the mind which we are perhaps most subject to in early youth, I at once gave up my former occupations, set down natural history and all its progeny as a deformed and abortive creation, and entertained the greatest disdain for a would-be science which could never even step within the threshold of real knowledge. In this mood of mind I betook myself to the mathematics and the branches of study appertaining to that science as being built upon secure foundations, and so worthy of my consideration. What is the effect of having Victor summarize the events of his childhood rather than telling them in detail? Readers can only guess at who Victor really is. Readers can see the events from more than one perspective. Readers cannot form an opinion without Victor's interpretation. Readers see little to suggest Victor is guilty of any crime. I am not sure about this one but I think the answer is the third one